Legal Opinion
State v. Cato
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 8, 1990No. 6897PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDupont, C. J.
The defendant appeals from his conviction, after a jury trial, of possession of narcotics with intent to sell, in violation of General Statutes § 21a-277 (a). He claims that the court’s exclusion of a statement made by him to the arresting officer violated evidentiary principles as well as his state and federal constitu*405tional rights to present a defense. He also claims error both in the court’s denial of his request for the jury to view the scene of the alleged crime from the same point of surveillance as was used by the police to observe him just prior to his arrest and in its failure to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- State v. FlynnConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- State v. SilveiraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. CaseySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. SavageSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. FreeneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. CintronConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- State v. TysonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- State v. BrownConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- State v. VerrinderSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.