Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Richardson

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided August 17, 2000No. SC94810PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

766 So.2d 1036 (2000)

Charlene RICHARDSON, Appellant,

v.

Adrienne RICHARDSON, Appellee.

No. SC94810.

Supreme Court of Florida.

August 17, 2000.

Robert R. Kimmel of the Law Offices of Kimmel & Batson, Chartered, Pensacola, Florida, for Appellant.

Adrienne E. Richardson, Zionville, North Carolina, Appellee, pro se.

2Per curiam

We have for review Richardson v. Richardson, 734 So.2d 1063 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999), a decision of the district court declaring invalid a state statute. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. Consistent with our recent rulings on similar issues, we affirm the district court decision…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

3Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Padgett v. Dept. of Health & Rehab. ServicesSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  2. Schmitt v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  3. Cramp v. BOARD OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OF ORANGESupreme Court of Florida · 1962
  4. Beagle v. BeagleSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  5. Waldrup v. DuggerSupreme Court of Florida · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by26 opinions

  1. NORTH FLA. WOMEN'S HEALTH SERVICES v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
  2. Hiller v. FauseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Fl. Dept. of Rev. v. FL. MUN. POWER AGENCYSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  4. In Re Marriage of HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Sullivan v. SappSupreme Court of Florida · 2004

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API