Robert Stratton v. Judy Stratton Ussing
Court of Appeals of Mississippi
1Opinion of the Court
MAXWELL, J.,
for the Court:
¶ 1. Under Mississippi Rule of Evidence 408, evidence of an offer to settle a disputed claim is inadmissible when the purpose of the evidence is to prove the validity or invalidity of the claim or its amount. But the rule is clear that settlement evidence is admissible “when it is offered for another purpose.” M.R.E. 408. Here, Judy Strat-ton Ussing offered evidence that her brother, Robert Stratton, paid her $10,000 for her to release him from “any and-all claims” she had against him — including a pending criminal charge. The purpose of this settlement evidence was…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Harrison v. Chandler-Sampson Ins., Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2005
- City of Mound Bayou v. JohnsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
- Strong v. NicholsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
- Van v. Grand Casinos of Mississippi, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2000
- Van v. Grand Casinos of Miss., Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.