In re Goldfarb Bros.
District Court, N.D. Georgia
In Bankruptcy. On rule against bankrupts for contempt for failure to surrender property to the trustee.
1Opinion of the Court
NEWMAN, District Judge.
This is a proceeding as for contempt against the bankrupts Herman and Max Goldfarb, trading under the firm name of Goldfarb Bros. The proceeding is based upon the allegation that the bankrupts have failed to turn over to the trustee in bankruptcy a considerable amount of merchandise, or the cash which should be the proceeds of the same. This petition was referred to the referee, and he has taken some evidence, and makes a report finding that the bankrupts “should be chargeable with the shortage in their goods and their money in the sum of $6,245.25.” The referee reaches…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Boyd v. GlucklichCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
- American Trust Co. v. WallisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1903
- Ripon Knitting Works v. SchreiberDistrict Court, D. Washington · 1900
- In re GerstelDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1903
- In re KaneDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- May v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- In re NisensonDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1910
- In re SilvermanDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1913
- Moody v. ColeDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1906