Legal Opinion

Hurst v. Krinzman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 23, 1970No. 70-10PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal is by the plaintiff below, Marion P. Hurst (since deceased) from an adverse judgment based on a directed verdict entered on defendant’s motion following presentation of evidence by plaintiff.

Established by Florida decisions so numerous as to preclude a need for their citation, are the rules that a trial court should not direct a verdict for defendant unless it is clear that there is no evidence whatever adduced that could in law support a verdict for plaintiff; and that an appellate court, on review of a judgment based on a directed verdict for defendant should consider the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. J. G. Christopher Co. v. RussellSupreme Court of Florida · 1912
  2. Southern Express Co. v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1913
  3. Teston v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1913
  4. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. WylieSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
  5. Dempsey-Vanderbilt Hotel, Inc. v. HuismanSupreme Court of Florida · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Forster v. Red Top Sedan Service, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  2. Joseph Uram Jewelers, Inc. v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  3. National Bank of Melbourne & Trust Co. v. BatchelorDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  4. Hayden, Stone Inc. v. EchteldDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  5. Warriner v. RamirezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API