Legal Opinion · Dissent

Levas v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1944No. 29242Published

1DissentGrady, J.

(dissenting) — I am unable to agree with that part of the majority opinion which holds that the order of this court providing that the action brought by Chatos against Levas to recover a judgment on a promissory note and to foreclose a mortgage securing it be dismissed, in effect, operated as a dismissal of the cross-appeal taken by Chatos from the part of the judgment allowing Mrs. Levas an offset against the note; and that it also actually disposed of the cross-appeal on its merits so as to render the appellant here liable on the cross-appeal cost bond upon which it was a surety.

The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lewis Publishing Co. v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Chatos v. LevasWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. StotskyWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Smith v. KneisleyWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  5. State ex rel. Netherlands American Mortgage Bank v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API