Legal Opinion

Farragher v. City of New York

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 18, 1967PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Motion by respondent Nazwin Associates, Inc., granted and appeal dismissed upon the ground that the appeal has not been timely taken. Where the order of the Appellate Division is final, the appeal lies only from that paper and not from the judgment subsequently entered thereon (CPLR 5611; Storch v. Moritsky, 17 N Y 2d 917), and the last sentence of CPLR 5512 (subd. [a]) is not intended to save a late appeal.

Motion by plaintiffs denied on the basis of O’Brien v. City of New York (6 A D 2d 63) with leave to renew upon the oral argument.

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Dobess Realty Corp. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  2. Blank v. SchafrannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Williams v. ForbesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. Maddox v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  5. Copeland v. Weyerhaeuser Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API