Legal Opinion

Holdridge v. Garretson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1929No. 21491. Department TwoPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This action was brought to enforce the terms of a written contract for the sale of fifteen thousand shares of the capital stock of a corporation. To the second amended complaint, which will be referred to as the complaint, a demurrer was interposed and sustained. The plaintiff refused to plead further and elected to stand upon his complaint. A judgment was entered, dismissing the action, from which he appeals.

The Lloyd G-arretson Company, a corporation, was engaged in business in the city of Yakima. The appellant owned fifteen' thousand shares of its capital stock, of the par value of one…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Union Pac. Ry. Co. v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1892
  2. Castle Creek Water Co. v. City of AspenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  3. Coles v. PeckIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Parsons v. AmbosSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  5. Biddle v. RamseySupreme Court of Missouri · 1873

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Grandview Inland Fruit Co. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API