People v. De Pasquale
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
The sole ground on which defendant maintains that his confession should have been suppressed is that James Turner, defendant’s brother-in-law and a New York City police officer in another precinct, urged him to speak with the authorities after he had invoked his right to remain *695silent. In defendant’s view, the record shows that the police induced or actively aided Turner’s conduct and thus failed to observe defendant’s decision not to speak. The affirmed findings, however, are to the contrary. On this…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- People v. SorgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
3Cited by20 opinions
- People v. AlaireAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- People v. DellaroccoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- People v. McCannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. WarrenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.