Legal Opinion

Palenick v. City of Rio Rancho

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided February 6, 2012No. 33,380; Docket No. 30,136Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SUTIN, Judge.

{1} After the City of Rio Rancho (the City) was informed by the New Mexico Attorney General that its termination of Plaintiff James Palenick as its City Manager violated the Open Meetings Act (the Act), NMSA 1978, §§ 10-15-1 to -4 (1974, as amended through 2009), the City, in a meeting eleven months after the termination, passed a resolution attempting to retroactively cure the violation. Plaintiff sued on two counts: Count I, to enforce the Act, and Count II, for debt and money due under the employment agreement for the period between the initial termination and the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. RiveraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Tsosie v. Foundation Reserve Insurance CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Concerned Residents of Santa Fe North, Inc. v. Santa Fe Estates, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Kleinberg v. Board of EducationNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Board of Education v. SullivanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API