Legal Opinion

Holmes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 17, 1964No. 4781PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal arises upon denial of appellant’s motion for relief under Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix. The motion alleged that appellant, indigent and unable to retain counsel, was arraigned, pleaded guilty, was convicted and subsequently sentenced without the advice or assistance of counsel. The lower court, after examining the “files and records” in the cause, found that appellant had not requested counsel, that appellant had not apprised the court of his indigency and that despite the allegations of the motion it was not affirmatively shown that appellant had been…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. King v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  2. Beadles v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  3. Dixon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  4. Phillips v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mason v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1965
  2. Falagon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  3. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API