Legal Opinion

Erb Strapping Co. v. Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 10, 1968PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

In this proceeding petitioners-respondents (Erb Strapping Co., Inc., Michael Genovese and Vincent J. Pica) moved pursuant to CPLR 2304 to quash the subpoenas served by the respondent-appellant Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor. The subpoenas in question required the corporate petitioner to produce various books and records maintained during the preceding two and one-half year period and the individual petitioners to give testimony in connection with ‘ ‘ an investigation being conducted * * * concerning waterfront practices and conditions generally.” Such an investigation is authorized…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of Edge Ho Holding Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Carlisle v. BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1935

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Goldin v. GreenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Citizens Helping Achieve New Growth & Employment—New York, Inc. v. New York State Board of ElectionsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Parisi v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  4. Eastern Industrial Supply Corp. v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  5. In re Worldwide Management Consultants, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API