Legal Opinion

Kettenbach v. Omaha Life Ass'n

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1897No. 6956PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion for rehearing of case reported in 49 Neb., 842.

1Opinion of the Court

Ragan, C.

The defense of the insurance company to this action proceeded upon two theories: (1) That the statements made by the assured in his application were warranties; and (2) that if the statements made were representations they were false. In the opinion filed in the case we held thaj: the statements of the assured in the application were representations, and not warranties, and that in order for the falsity of the representations made by the assured to constitute a defense to the action it was incumbent upon the insurance company to plead and prove that the statements and answers alleged…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Omaha Life Ass'n v. KettenbachNebraska Supreme Court · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API