Rivercity v. American Can Company
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM: *
At oral argument, counsel for appellant Rivercity stated (correctly, we believe) that its case depended upon' whether the letter dated September 8, 1971, from Whitney National Bank of New Orleans to Rivercity created a guaranty by Whitney of the obligations of Jackson Brewing Company under Jackson’s option agreement with Riv-ercity. We reject that construction of the September letter; that letter states only that the rights of Rivercity under the option agreement will prime the rights of Whitney under the Act of Collateral Mortgage and related note and the Act of Subordination…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Rivercity v. American Can Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1984
3Cited by8 opinions
- Unsecured Creditors Committee of Debtor v. Noyes (In Re STN Enterprises, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 1987
- Spruiell v. LudwigLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
- Water Craft Management, L.L.C. v. Mercury MarineDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2004
- Hazeltine Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986
- State Bank & Trust Co. v. Boat "D.J. Griffin"District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.