Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Perigen

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1983PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARBISON, Justice.

This case involves the rule of implied revocation of those portions of a will bequeathing property to a spouse where the husband and wife are later divorced and a property settlement is entered into in connection with the divorce proceedings. The trial court held that the will of the decedent, Eugene Eueal Perigen, was revoked, insofar as it pertained to his former wife, because of their subsequent divorce and property settlement. The Court of Appeals reversed and remanded for further proceedings. This Court granted permission to appeal. 1

The facts developed in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rankin v. McDearmonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1953
  2. In Re Blanchard EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Price v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1954
  4. Frank v. FrankTennessee Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Hailey v. HaileyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1943

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hinders v. HindersMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Rasco v. Estate of RascoMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Thelma M. Hinders v. Joyce Lynne HindersMississippi Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API