Legal Opinion
Metropolitan District Commission v. American Federation of State
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 21, 1995No. 13197PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHeiman, J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment of the trial court vacating an arbitration award pursuant to General Statutes § 52-418.1 On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly granted the plaintiff’s application to vacate the award because the evidence was not sufficient to support a finding that the plaintiff’s rights were prejudiced by the failure of the arbitration panel to hold three-way discussions.2 We agree with the defendant and reverse the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts are relevant to this appeal. The defendant union represents employees of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- O & G/O'Connell Joint Venture v. Chase Family Ltd. Partnership No. 3Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Schwarzschild v. MartinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- City of Hartford v. Connecticut State Board of Mediation & ArbitrationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Norwich Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp. v. Southern New England Contracting Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Diamond Fertiliser & Chemical Corp. v. Commodities Trading International Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Metropolitan District Commission v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council 4, Local 184Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Marulli v. Wood Frame Construction Co., LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Clairol, Inc. v. Enertrac Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- City of Hartford v. Local 1716, Council 4, AFSCMEConnecticut Superior Court · 1996
- Metropolitan District Commission v. American Federation of StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.