Legal Opinion · Dissent

Imperial Oil of North Dakota, Inc. v. Industrial Commission

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1987No. Civ. 11222Published

1DissentMeschke, Justice

Interest on debt for drilling and operating an oil well can be a “reasonable actual cost” for the Industrial Commission to allocate to fractional operating interests which are involuntarily pooled under N.D.C.C. § 38-08-08. Therefore, I respectfully dissent.

In regulating oil and gas development, the North Dakota Industrial Commission must pool “all interests in the spacing unit for the development and operations [of a well] ... [i]n the absence of voluntary pooling, ...” N.D.C.C. § 38-08-08. The order “shall be upon terms and conditions that are just and reasonable,” affording each interest…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hall GMC, Inc. v. Crane Carrier Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Amoco Production Co. v. North Dakota Industrial CommissionNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Triangle Oilfield Services, Inc. v. HagenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Berg v. HoganNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Application of KohlmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API