Legal Opinion

Freudenberger v. Copeland

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 19, 1972No. 399, September Term, 1971PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoylan, J.

The fundamental question here raised is whether primary negligence, as a matter of law, will be attributed to a motorist who turns to his left in exiting a street or roadway onto an intersecting street, alley, private road, or driveway and, thereby, is struck by a vehicle approaching from the opposite direction.

The automobile collision which gave rise to the present litigation occurred on Sunday morning, November 9, 1969, at 11 a.m. It occurred on U.S. Route #1 one mile south of Laurel, Maryland. At that point, U.S. Route #1 is on a north-south axis. It is four lanes wide, two lanes running…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Fowler v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  2. Yommer v. McKenzieCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  3. Peroti v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  4. Safeway Trails, Inc. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  5. Meldrum v. Kellam Distributing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1957

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stella v. Boodoo v. Jerome Cary Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
  2. Kelch v. Mass Transit AdministrationCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  3. Bright v. MyersCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  4. Hart v. A.C.E. TaxiDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2006
  5. Kelch v. Mass Transit AdministrationCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API