Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Renno v. Seaboard Air Line Railway

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 11, 1922No. 10867Published

1Concurrence

It is important that we keep before us the precise question we are called upon to determine. As I understand it, the question is: Did the Circuit Judge commit reversible error when he refused to direct a verdict in favor of the defendant, and when he permitted the jury to determine whether or not the defendant had maintained on its premises the pond in question; was it an artificial body of water, attractive and dangerous to children who might follow their childish instincts, and, if so, was it reasonably safeguarded against use by immature children?

The question is raised in various forms of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Franks v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  2. Sexton v. Noll Const. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1918
  3. Hayes v. Southern Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1913
  4. McLendon v. Hampton Cotton MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1917
  5. Tucker v. Clinton Cotton MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API