Legal Opinion

Killgo v. James

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 6, 1963No. 5-2936PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Eose Smith, J.

In 1949 Charles and Euby Killgo bought a home in Hot Springs, as tenants by the entirety. In 1954 the couple were divorced by a decree of the Garland Chancery Court. The decree approved a property settlement by which the parties agreed to sell the home later on and divide the proceeds. The property had not been sold, however, when Charles died in October of 1959. His heirs, the appellants, then brought this suit for partition against Charles’s former wife, Euby Killgo Dunn, upon the theory that the property settlement and divorce decree had converted the tenancy by the entirety into a tenancy…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brimson v. BrimsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bruce v. DyerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  2. Ramsey v. RamseySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  3. Rucks v. TaylorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  4. Rucks v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1983
  5. Villanova v. PollockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API