Legal Opinion

Culpen v. Hann

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1954No. 33517PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

The appellant filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the district court for Lancaster County on October 8, 1953, in which he asserted he was improperly held in the State Penitentiary. The trial court refused to issue the writ for the reason that the petition failed to allege facts sufficient to state a cause of action. The petitioner appeals.

It is fundamental that a petition for a writ of habeas corpus must state a cause of action, and if it does not the court may properly enter an order denying the writ. Howell v. Hann, 155 Neb. 698, 53 N. W. 2d 81, certiorari denied 343 U. S. 981,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re WalshNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Luke v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
  3. State ex rel. Allen v. RyderNebraska Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Stapleman v. HannNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Howell v. HannNebraska Supreme Court · 1952

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. McNernyNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. JonesNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. RodmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Becker v. NebraskaDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1970
  5. Dixon v. HannNebraska Supreme Court · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API