Legal Opinion
In re Kerekes
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 3, 2012PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1998 and resided in California.
By decision dated June 11, 2009, this Court suspended respondent from the practice of law pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (f), upon his conviction of the serious crimes of conspiracy to defraud the United States, commit tax evasion, aid and assist in the preparation of false tax returns, and obstruct and impede the due administration of the Internal Revenue Service, in violation of 18 USC § 371, and tax evasion, in violation of 26 USC § 7201, all federal felonies (Matter of Kerekes, 63 AD3d 1370 [2009]).…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re RichichiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- In re UhlAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re KerekesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re CooperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- In re CooperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Matter of AdlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Matter of GillmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025
- MatterofCooperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014