King v. King
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 3, March T., 1920, by respondent, from decree of C. P. Tioga County, Sept. T., 1914, No. 169, granting a divorce in the case of Preston E. King v. Ola G. King. Libel in divorce. Before Smith, P. J., of 34th Judicial District, specially presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. The court awarded a divorce. Eespondent appealed. Error assigned was the decree of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Linn, J.,
The trial judge helow after hearing the witnesses in open court, sustained a complaint in divorce for two causes: indignities to the person of libellant and adultery with a named person. This appeal is from that decree. The former only of the-two causes was stated in the complaint filed; the latter was added by amendment.
Appellant complains that the statutory affidavit “......that the said complaint is not made out of levity or by collusion between the said husband and wife and for the mere purpose of being freed and separated from each other, but in sincerity and truth for…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ehrhardt v. EhrhardtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
3Cited by7 opinions
- Quinn v. QuinnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Cook v. CookSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Bowden v. BowdenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Lisle v. LisleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Commonwealth v. MohrBerks County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.