Legal Opinion
In re L.M.
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided February 14, 2014No. 13-355PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtReiber, C.J.
¶ 1. Father appeals from the trial court’s order finding his daughter L.M. to be a child in need of care or supervision (CHINS). He raises numerous arguments. We affirm.
¶2. The record indicates the following. L.M. was born in June 2010. On May 31, 2013, the Department for Children and Families (DCF) filed a petition alleging that L.M, was CHINS.1 The court issued a temporary care order on June 4, 2013, assigning temporary legal custody of L.M. to her patern.1 grandmother subject to a condition.1 custody order. Mother later stipulated that L.M. was CHINS due to mother’s drug use and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- In re A.F.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- In re C. P.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2012
- Department of Human Services v. G. D. W.Oregon Supreme Court · 2012
- Payrits v. PayritsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
- In Re Ty. B.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- In re B.R.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2014
- In re M.K. JuvenileSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
- In re J.C. & T.F., JuvenilesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
- In re M.M. and C.M., JuvenilesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
- In Re A.O. & I.O., Juveniles & in Re B.G. & E.G., JuvenilesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2023
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.