Legal Opinion
Santana v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 28, 1992PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lewis R. Friedman, J.), entered June 5, 1991, which denied petitioners’ motion to file a late notice of claim, unanimously reversed, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, and the motion is granted, without costs.
Petitioner Marisol Santana claims that during a two-year period from 1988 to 1990, while she was a tenant in a city-owned building, she was threatened and assaulted by her next door neighbor, Guillermo Vidal, and that she made repeated requests of the building manager to relocate her and her infant son, but these requests were ignored or…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Goodall v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Matey v. Bethlehem Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Matey v. Bethlehem Central School DistrictNew York Supreme Court · 1977
- Smiley-Walsch v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
3Cited by11 opinions
- Dubowy v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Porcaro v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Nunez v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Camacho v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Ruperti v. Lake Luzerne Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.