Plymouth-Canton Community Schools v. State Tenure Commission
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrickley, J.
This case presents the question whether procedural due process is denied a public school teacher accused of misconduct when the attorney who sits as hearing officer at the teacher’s pretermination hearing before the local board of education is a member of the same law firm as the attorney representing the charging party, in this case the superintendent. We answer this question in the negative and remand this case to the State Tenure Commission for review de novo of the merits of the teacher’s administrative appeal.
A teacher’s pretermination hearing is not a full, adjudicatory hearing to which…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hortonville Joint School District No. 1 v. Hortonville Education Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Brock v. Roadway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ferrario v. Escanaba Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
- Niemi v. Kearsley Board of EducationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lakeshore Board of Education v. GrindstaffMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
- Lakeshore Board of Education v. GrindstaffMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
- Plymouth-Canton Community Schools v. State Tenure CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1990