Legal Opinion

Majority of the Residents of Mongolo Subdivision v. City of Sparks

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1981No. 12953PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The respondent, City of Sparks, annexed the Mongolo Subdivision which is completely surrounded by the City. A majority of the residents, both in number and assessed valuation, obtained in the district court an order temporarily staying the City’s annexation proceedings, which the court, acting upon the City’s petition, later set aside. The residents have appealed ■that decision.

NRS 268.660(2) sets forth the statutory standards for the annexation of territory by a City where, as here, the property owners protest:

2. Annexation of territory to a city may be approved over any protest…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thompson v. City of SalisburyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Louallen v. MillerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  3. Webber v. City of ScottsbluffNebraska Supreme Court · 1971

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API