Catronio v. Chevrolet
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtThomas P. Farley, J.
Defendant Rodenhurst Chevrolet, Inc., hereinafter referred to as “ Rodenhurst ’ moves to dismiss the cross complaint of defendant General Motors Corp. for insufficiency and upon the ground that the same is not interposable under section 264 of the Civil Practice Act.
The complaint contains three separate causes of action. The first two causes of action are directed solely against Rodway, an auto and truck dealer, based on claims of breach of warranty and negligence, respectively, in that Rodway sold plaintiff a defective new 1960 Chevrolet half-ton pickup truck in which plaintiff sustained…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ruping v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Anderson v. Liberty Fast Freight Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- Cretella v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1956
3Cited by1 opinion
- Riberdy v. Denby Stores, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963