Siegman v. Siegman
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.
It is plaintiff’s contention that no sufficient counterclaim was pleaded by defendants. This is the main question in the case. Section 2-1001, Oregon Code 1930, provides that a judgment for a nonsuit may be given against the plaintiff, (1) on motion of the plaintiff, at any time before trial, unless a counterclaim has been pleaded as a defense; (2) on motion of either party, upon the written consent of the other filed with the clerk; (3) on motion of the defendant, when the action is called for trial, and the plaintiff fails to appear, or when after the trial has begun, and before the final…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. RichardsIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
- Daniels v. Foster & KleiserOregon Supreme Court · 1920
- Kondo v. AylsworthOregon Supreme Court · 1916
- Meadow Valley Land Co. v. ManerudOregon Supreme Court · 1916
- La Grande Nat. Bank v. OliverOregon Supreme Court · 1917