Legal Opinion

Stumpf v. Houk

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 11, 2011No. 01-3613Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

653 F.3d 426 (2011)

John David STUMPF, Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

Marc C. HOUK, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 01-3613.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Argued: July 26, 2007.

Decided and Filed: August 11, 2011.

ARGUED: Alan M. Freedman, Midwest Center for Justice, Ltd., Evanston, Illinois, for Appellant. Stephen E. Maher, Office of the Ohio Attorney General, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Alan M. Freedman, Carol R. Heise, Midwest Center for Justice, Ltd., Evanston, Illinois, for Appellant. Stephen E. Maher, Charles L. Wille, Carol Ann Ellensohn, Office of the Ohio Attorney…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Daughtrey; Dissent.

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Barefoot v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API