Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. a & B Coal Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 1, 1947PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.

The plaintiff sought damages and specific performance of an agreement claimed to have been made by the defendant to sell its property. The defendant demurred, substantially on the .ground that it did not appear that it had signed any memorandum sufficient to satisfy the Statute of Frauds. The trial court sustained the demurrer and the plaintiffs appealed.

The complaint was in two counts. The first count contained the following allegations: The defendant owned the property in question which was occupied by the plaintiffs as tenants. On June 6, 1946, the plaintiffs agreed to buy and the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nichols v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1834
  2. Jacobson v. HendricksSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
  3. Kohlbrecher v. GuettermannIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Shoag v. SheftelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  5. Devine v. WarnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bogoratt v. Pratt & Whitney Aircraft Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  2. DeLuca v. C. W. Blakeslee & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API