Legal Opinion

Opinion Number

Louisiana Attorney General Reports

Decided September 22, 1999Published

1Opinion of the Court

Dear Mr. Comeaux:

You requested an opinion of our office and submitted information gathered by Mr. Steven Jankower, Assistant City/Parish Attorney. The question posed is whether city-parish employees must, as a condition of their employment, take the oath of office required by R.S. 42:52. The information submitted indicated that, apparently through oversight, many city-parish employees have been employed in the classified civil service beyond the probationary period and appear to have gained civil service tenure but yet have not taken the specified oath of office. The information also notes…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Shelton v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Keyishian v. Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Baggett v. BullittSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Wieman v. UpdegraffSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. In Re GriffithsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API