Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Shirley

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 8, 1978No. Crim. 29666PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JEFFERSON (Bernard), J.

By an amended grand jury indictment, Thad Smith Shirley and Joyce A. Richards (hereinafter respondents) were charged in count I with grand theft in violation of Penal Code section 487, subdivision 1. In count II, respondents were charged with forgery in violation of Penal Code section 470.

Respondents demurred to the amended indictments; the demurrers were overruled. Pursuant to Penal Code section 995, respondents then moved to set aside both counts of the indictment. The trial court granted their motions as to count I. The People have appealed from this order…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. AshleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. People v. OrinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. People v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Greenberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. People v. DrakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. KubaHawaii Supreme Court · 1985
  3. People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. People v. BookerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. People v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API