Legal Opinion

Pohlman v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 25, 1985No. 84-1503PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The trial court entered summary final judgment for the defendants declaring that no uninsured motorist coverage was available to the plaintiffs because of the application of the exclusion in the insurance policy issued to George W. Pohlman, stating that the uninsured motorist insurance does not apply “[t]o bodily injury suffered while occupying a motor vehicle owned by you ... but not insured for uninsured motorist coverage under this policy, or to bodily injury from being hit by any such vehicle.” The propriety of this judgment turns on whether this exclusion, valid at the time the policy…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mullis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1971
  2. Metro. Property and Liability Ins. Co. v. GrayDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  3. New Hampshire Ins. Group v. HarbachSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  4. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. v. GantDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. v. PohlmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API