Legal Opinion

In re Krouner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 12, 2011PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1973. He maintained an office for the practice of law in the City of Albany. He presently resides in San Diego, California.

On February 20, 2003, respondent pleaded guilty to three felonies in Supreme Court in Albany County and, accordingly, this Court entered an order of disbarment on May 23, 2003 (Matter of Krouner, 305 AD2d 932 [2003]). Respondent now applies for reinstatement. Petitioner advises that it does not oppose the application.

Because we conclude that respondent has not shown by clear and convincing evidence that he possesses the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re KrounerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re KrounerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. In re KrounerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. In re OswaldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  4. In re OswaldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API