Legal Opinion
People v. Rahming
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 13, 1970PublishedCited by 120 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBreitel, J.
On defendant’s appeal from a conviction for robbery two issues have been raised requiring a new trial and a new preliminary identification hearing. The first relates to improper cross-examination of defendant by the prosecutor to elicit and then contradict on rebuttal by extrinsic proof matter excludable because obtained in violation of the rules laid down in Miranda v. Arizona (384 U. S. 436). The second relates to a suggestive lineup identification of defendant casting doubt upon the victim’s in-court identification.
On July 7, 1967 at 9:30 a.m., Mrs. Mattie Wright was asleep in her…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- People v. SorgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by120 opinions
- People v. ChippNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- People v. DodtNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. ElyNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. RileyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. WiseNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.