Legal Opinion

Shrigley v. Black

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 11, 1898No. 10734PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from Cowley District Court. J. A. Burnette, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtDoster, C. J.

This action was for the foreclosure of a mortgage upon real estate. A demurrer to the petition was sustained, upon the grounds that the facts stated were not sufficient to constitute a cause of action and that several causes of action were improperly joined. From the order sustaining the demurrer and from the judgment following it the plaintiff prosecutes error to this court.

*488The facts stated in the petition may be summarized as follows. Soranus L. Brettun owned the property in controversy. He died, leaving a will in which Margaret Brettun, his wife, and Charles C. Black were named as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Frankland v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Gestring v. FisherMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. B. F. Myers Tailoring Co. v. KeeleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1894

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Tishomingo v. IngleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Gaer v. Bank of BakerMontana Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Exchange National Bank v. Estate of BettsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API