Legal Opinion

Tull v. Florida Unemployment Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 12, 1997No. 96-3374Published

1Per curiam

Because the Unemployment Appeals Commission impermissibly substituted its judgment for that of the fact-finder, the order denying 'unemployment benefits must be reversed and the cause remanded with directions that benefits be awarded. See Scardino v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 603 So.2d 549 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). Accord Clay County Sheriff’s Office v. Loos, 570 So.2d 394 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); Shackleton v. *498Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 534 So.2d 753 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ERVIN, KAHN and BENTON, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Clay County Sheriff's Office v. LoosDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  2. Scardino v. UNEMP. APPEALS COM'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  3. Shackleton v. FLA. UNEMP. APP. COM'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988