Tull v. Florida Unemployment Commission
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Because the Unemployment Appeals Commission impermissibly substituted its judgment for that of the fact-finder, the order denying 'unemployment benefits must be reversed and the cause remanded with directions that benefits be awarded. See Scardino v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 603 So.2d 549 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). Accord Clay County Sheriff’s Office v. Loos, 570 So.2d 394 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); Shackleton v. *498Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 534 So.2d 753 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988).
REVERSED and REMANDED.
ERVIN, KAHN and BENTON, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Clay County Sheriff's Office v. LoosDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Scardino v. UNEMP. APPEALS COM'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Shackleton v. FLA. UNEMP. APP. COM'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988