Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Research Automation Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided October 16, 1978No. 68, Docket 78-6006PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IRVING R. KAUFMAN, Chief Judge:
In this era of mounting congestion at every level of the federal courts, procedural devices capable, of terminating litigation quickly efficiently, and fairly acquire increased significance. One of the most important of these mechanisms is the motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Today we take the opportunity to restate the law covering such motions, in the context of an action brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission to enjoin violations of the securities laws. Our aim is primarily to illustrate the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Annette Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Manor Nursing Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- The Johns Hopkins University v. William E. HuttonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
- American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company v. American Broadcasting-Paramount Theatres, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1985
- Kelley v. CarrDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1983
- Orshan v. AnkerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1980
- McDaniel v. General Motors Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1979
- Prompt Elec. Supply Co., Inc. v. Allen-Bradley Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1980
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.