Legal Opinion
Mergel v. Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided August 31, 1956PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
41 N.J. Super. 372 (1956)
125 A.2d 292
SOPHIE MERGEL, AS ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF ALBERT MERGEL, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
COLGATE-PALMOLIVE-PEET CO., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued July 2, 1956.
Decided August 31, 1956.
Before Judges GOLDMANN, SULLIVAN and BURTON.
Mr. Robert C. Gruhin argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant (Mr. Morris Edelstein, attorney).
Mr. Robert Shaw argued the cause for the defendant-respondent (Messrs. Shaw, Pindar, McElroy & Connell, attorneys).
The opinion of the court was delivered by BURTON,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bianchi v. South Park Presbyterian ChurchSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1939
- Broecker v. Armstrong Cork Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1942
- Hendrikson v. Koppers Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- Schlossberg v. Jersey City Sewerage AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Jenkins v. DEVINE FOODS, INCORPORATED, a CORPORATIONSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Strachan v. John F. Kennedy Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Wolczak v. National Electric Products Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Cassano v. AschoffNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- Hite v. Maritime Overseas CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1974
- Trent v. Atlantic City Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.