Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Palomino
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
This appeal by Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York is from an order entitled Amended Order and Summary Judgment in which the Court held that Fidelity’s policy extended coverage to the collision which was the subject of the suit. The order was entered nine months after a regularly entered final judgment against Fidelity, which was pursuant to a regularly entered default. The final judgment was not appealed. We hold that the order appealed was without legal effect, but that the final judgment entered on May 25,1979 for Pascual Palomino and against Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York is…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kippy Corporation v. ColburnSupreme Court of Florida · 1965
- BOARD OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OF DADE CTY. v. DinkinesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
- Hardin v. WilkinsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
3Cited by3 opinions
- Francisco v. Victoria Marine ShippingDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Maresca v. OlivoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Public Health Trust of Dade County v. KempsterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983