Legal Opinion

Costilla, Eusebio Soloranzo

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 6, 2004No. PD-1901-02Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. 1901-02

EUSEBIO SOLORANZO COSTILLA, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM THE NINTH COURT OF APPEALS

MONTGOMERY COUNTY

2Opinion of the Court · HolcombHolcomb, J., joined by Keller, P.J., Meyers, Price, Johnson, Keasler, Hervey, and, Cochran, Jj,

Womack, J., concurred in the result.

O P I N I O N

We granted review to determine whether the court of appeals erred in holding that strict compliance with Article 27.13 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure was not required in this case. Appellant argues his conviction is void because the trial court did not obtain an oral plea from him or otherwise failed to interact with him personally,…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Matchett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  2. Shields v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  3. Mendez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  4. Briones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  5. Mendez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API