Legal Opinion

Arzaga v. Gill

District Court, S.D. California

Decided March 18, 2021No. 3:21-cv-00041Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL AARON ARZAGA, Case No.: 3:21-cv-00041-CAB-MSB CDCR #K-89848, 12 1) GRANTING MOTION TO Plaintiff, 13 PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS vs. (ECF No. 31); 14 15 2) DENYING AS MOOT MOTION DAVID M. GILL, et al., TO PROCEED IN FORMA 16 Defendants. PAUPERIS (ECF No. 29); 17 AND 18 19 3) DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR LACK OF SUBJECT-MATTER 20 JURISDICTION PURSUANT TO 21 FED. R. CIV. P. 12(h)(3) AND FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM 22 PURSUANT TO

28 U.S.C. § 23

1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) AND 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) 24 25 26 Plaintiff…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API