Tettamble v. State

CLEMENS, Senior Judge.

Movant, formerly defendant Gerald F. Tettamble, has appealed the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion.1 Previously we ruled on the current trial court’s summary denial of defendant’s motion. In Tettamble v. State, 684 S.W.2d 67 (Mo.App.1984) we remanded because the motion court had failed to comply with Rule 27.26(i); that rule requires the court to make findings and conclusions on all issues presented.

Pursuant to our order the motion court then complied and filed its judgment denying defendant’s motion, from which defendant has now appealed, contending: The court failed to…