Legal Opinion

Gibson v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 26, 1984No. AV-461PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The circuit court’s denial of appellant’s petition for writ of mandamus seeking review of the presumptive parole release date established by the Commission is affirmed because appellant failed to allege in his petition, or show by providing an appendix, that he had exhausted his administrative remedies. See Houston v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 377 So.2d 34 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN, C.J., and THOMPSON and WIG-GINTON, JJ„ concur.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Houston v. FLA. PAROLE & PROBATION COMM.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Holcomb v. Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  2. Smith v. Florida Parole & Probation CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  3. Coto v. Florida Commission on Offender ReviewDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024
  4. Wilson v. Florida Parole & Probation CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988