Legal Opinion
Baird v. Campbell
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 15, 1992PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
John A. Milano, J.,
In this bifurcated trial on the issue of damages, a former *858jury having previously determined the issue of liability, plaintiffs’ attorney moves the court to permit the use of six surveillance videotapes in behalf of the plaintiffs’ direct prima facie case, taken and recorded on various days in September 1992, approximately three years after the date of the occurrence regarding the use and operation of the defendant’s motor vehicle and the plaintiff who was struck thereby while a pedestrian.
Prior to the opening to the jury, plaintiffs’ attorney made an…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- DiMichel v. South Buffalo Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Jenkins v. RainnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
- Kane v. Her-Pet Refrigeration, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Marte v. W.O. Hickok Mfg. Co., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Careccia v. EnstromAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Barnes v. New York State Thruway AuthorityNew York Court of Claims · 1998
- Hairston v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 2004