Legal Opinion

Slater v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 7, 2001PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without *951costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for injuries she sustained when the front wheel on the driver’s side of her automobile fell off as she was driving. Plaintiff alleges that the wheel fell off due to a defect in the lug nuts that she allegedly purchased from Sears, Roebuck & Co. (defendant) five days before the accident. Supreme Court properly granted that part of defendant’s motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the second cause of action, alleging…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Denny v. Ford Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Abar v. Freightliner Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Otis v. Bausch & Lomb Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. Clark v. Globe Business Furniture, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. Bauer v. Bashline IndustriesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ebenezer Baptist Church v. Little Giant Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API