Legal Opinion

Charles Ruppman Advertising, Inc. v. Manhattan Life Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 16, 1968No. Gen. No. 68-27PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtScheineman, J.

The plaintiff, as successor to Thomson Advertising, Inc. brought suit on a life insurance policy issued by the defendant on the life of a Eobert Thomson, late president of the plaintiff, formerly named Thomson Advertising, Inc.

The Manhattan Life Ins. Company defended on the ground that the initial premium was not paid during the life of the insured, as the policy required. The trial court found for the plaintiff and entered judgment against the defendant for $25,000, from which this appeal is taken.

The judgment was based on the court’s finding that the Sam J. Stone Insurance Agency, which…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. SchlinkIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Rummler v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1942

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Early Settlers Ins. v. LayFairfax County Circuit Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API