Legal Opinion

Succession of Marx v. Schornstein

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 22, 1936No. 16366PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCALEB, Judge.

The defendant, Richard Schornstein, has appealed from a judgment .condemning him to pay to the plaintiff the sum of $110, together with interest and attorney’s fees.

The facts of the case are undisputed and the sole question for determination here is the interpretation of a provision contained in a contract of lease between the parties litigant-

On July 12, 1934, the succession of Itylrs. Fannye S. Marx leased, under written contract, the premises No. 1699 Robert street in the city of New Orleans to the defendant for a period of twelve months, commencing on October 1, 1934, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wood v. MonteleoneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
  2. Pelletier v. SutterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Owsley v. HamnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Rainey v. PietriLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1938
  3. Cross v. BrelandLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. Jacobs v. KaganLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API