Succession of Marx v. Schornstein
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
McCALEB, Judge.
The defendant, Richard Schornstein, has appealed from a judgment .condemning him to pay to the plaintiff the sum of $110, together with interest and attorney’s fees.
The facts of the case are undisputed and the sole question for determination here is the interpretation of a provision contained in a contract of lease between the parties litigant-
On July 12, 1934, the succession of Itylrs. Fannye S. Marx leased, under written contract, the premises No. 1699 Robert street in the city of New Orleans to the defendant for a period of twelve months, commencing on October 1, 1934, and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Wood v. MonteleoneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
- Pelletier v. SutterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
3Cited by4 opinions
- Owsley v. HamnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Rainey v. PietriLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1938
- Cross v. BrelandLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1939
- Jacobs v. KaganLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1943