Legal Opinion

International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. Dawson

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1921No. 2997PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Question certified from the Court of Civil Appeals for the Fifth District, in an appeal from Ellis County.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pierson

The facts of the case are clearly and concisely stated by the Court of Civil Appeals for the Fifth Supreme Judicial District of Texas in its certificate as follows:

“Appellee sued the International & Great Northern Railway Company and receivers, appellants, to recover statutory penalties for permitting Johnson grass to go to seed on the right-of-way of appellant railway company, while in the hands of receivers appointed by the United States Court, and judgment entered by the justice court and by the county court; and on appeal from the last judgment to this court the judgment was reversed and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. United States v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. Clark v. DyerTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Sloan v. Central Iowa Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1883

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Schechter v. Illinois, Department of Revenue (In Re Markos Gurnee Partnership)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
  2. International & G. N. Ry. Co. v. DawsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API